enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Yelp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yelp

    Yelp's website, Yelp.com, is a crowd-sourced local business review and social networking site.[8] The site has pages devoted to individual locations, such as restaurants or schools, where Yelp users can submit a review of their products or services[93]using a one to five stars rating scale.[16]

  3. Reliabilism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliabilism

    Reliabilism. Reliabilism, a category of theories in the philosophical discipline of epistemology, has been advanced as a theory both of justification and of knowledge. Process reliabilism has been used as an argument against philosophical skepticism, such as the brain in a vat thought experiment. [1] Process reliabilism is a form of epistemic ...

  4. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    A primary source in science is one where the authors directly participated in the research. They filled the test tubes, analyzed the data, or designed the particle accelerator, or at least supervised those who did. Many, but not all, journal articles are primary sources—particularly original research articles.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    The term is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online; however, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources.

  6. Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability...

    Consequently, some judgment and comparison of sources is needed in order to identify reliable sources. Reliable sources respect truth; a source that is commonly untruthful is not reliable. A source may be partly or more or less reliable. Concurrence of possibly reliable sources may help in identifying reliable sources, and editors should seek it.

  7. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Criteria for evaluating reliability. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the vandalized, damaged version. Accuracy of information provided within articles.

  8. Knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge

    Knowledge is a form of familiarity, awareness, understanding, or acquaintance. It often involves the possession of information learned through experience [1] and can be understood as a cognitive success or an epistemic contact with reality, like making a discovery. [2] Many academic definitions focus on propositional knowledge in the form of ...

  9. Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/FAQ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable...

    Reliable sources must be published. Are there sources that are "always reliable" or sources that are "always unreliable"? No. The reliability of a source is entirely dependent on the context of the situation, and the statement it is being used to support. Some sources are generally better than others, but reliability is always contextual.