enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sample size determination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination

    The table shown on the right can be used in a two-sample t-test to estimate the sample sizes of an experimental group and a control group that are of equal size, that is, the total number of individuals in the trial is twice that of the number given, and the desired significance level is 0.05. [4]

  3. Fisher's exact test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher's_exact_test

    Fisher's exact test (also Fisher-Irwin test) is a statistical significance test used in the analysis of contingency tables. [1] [2] [3] Although in practice it is employed when sample sizes are small, it is valid for all sample sizes.

  4. Sample ratio mismatch - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_ratio_mismatch

    The expected size of each group is 500. However, the actual sizes of the treatment and control groups are 600 and 400. Using Pearson's chi-squared goodness of fit test, we find a sample ratio mismatch with a p-value of 2.54 × 10-10.

  5. Design effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_effect

    If the sample size is 1,000, then the effective sample size will be 500. It means that the variance of the weighted mean based on 1,000 samples will be the same as that of a simple mean based on 500 samples obtained using a simple random sample.

  6. Risk score - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_score

    For example, a risk of 9 out of 10 will usually be considered as "high risk", but a risk of 7 out of 10 can be considered either "high risk" or "medium risk" depending on context. The definition of the intervals is on right open-ended intervals but can be equivalently defined using left open-ended intervals ( τ j − 1 , τ j ] {\displaystyle ...

  7. Risk matrix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_matrix

    Risk is the lack of certainty about the outcome of making a particular choice. Statistically, the level of downside risk can be calculated as the product of the probability that harm occurs (e.g., that an accident happens) multiplied by the severity of that harm (i.e., the average amount of harm or more conservatively the maximum credible amount of harm).

  8. Key risk indicator - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_Risk_Indicator

    Key risk indicators are metrics used by organizations to provide an early signal of increasing risk exposures in various areas of the enterprise. It differs from a key performance indicator (KPI) in that the latter is meant as a measure of how well something is being done while the former is an indicator of the possibility of future adverse impact.

  9. Bayes estimator - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes_estimator

    The Bayes risk of ^ is defined as ((, ^)), where the expectation is taken over the probability distribution of : this defines the risk function as a function of ^. An estimator θ ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {\theta }}} is said to be a Bayes estimator if it minimizes the Bayes risk among all estimators.