enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. PolyStation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolyStation

    Mini PolyStation 3 with an attachable controller and a small LCD screen. PolyStation consoles are sold under many different names, including the PS-Kid, Game Player, Play and Power, FunStation, Extra TV Game, and PSMan; [6] there are also a number of variations on the PolyStation name, such as PolyStation II, PolyStation III and Super PolyStation.

  3. Wikipedia:Be neutral in form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_neutral_in_form

    Articles on Wikipedia must conform to a neutral point of view, being neutral in both content and in form.Editors have had many successes in dealing with non-neutral content, by verifying facts to confirm that they are supported by reliable sources, ensuring that one viewpoint is not given undue weight and removing (or properly attributing) opinions.

  4. Ideological bias on Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia

    Research shows that Wikipedia is prone to neutrality violations caused by bias from its editors, including systemic bias. [6] [7] A comprehensive study conducted on ten different versions of Wikipedia revealed that disputes among editors predominantly arise on the subject of politics, encompassing politicians, political parties, political movements, and ideologies.

  5. Wikipedia : Neutral point of view/FAQ

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    The text of Wikipedia articles should assert facts, but not assert opinions as fact. When a statement is a fact (e.g., information that is accepted as true and about which there is no serious dispute), it should be asserted using Wikipedia's own voice without in-text attribution. Thus we write: "Mars is a planet" or "Plato was a philosopher".

  6. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    Wikipedia describes disputes, but does not engage in them. A neutral characterization of disputes requires presenting viewpoints with a consistently impartial tone; otherwise, articles end up as partisan commentaries even while presenting all relevant points of view. Even where a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinions ...

  7. Wikipedia : NPOV means neutral editing, not neutral content

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_means...

    Attempts to keep an article or its lead balanced and neutral (free of non-neutral opinions) are necessarily based on the subjective opinions and judgment of editors. They are therefore most often an expression of forbidden original research and are usually based on a misunderstanding of NPOV and " due and undue weight ".

  8. Neutrality (philosophy) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy)

    Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, doublethink, equality, [6] agreement, and objectivity. Apathy and indifference each imply a level of carelessness about a subject, though a person exhibiting neutrality may feel bias on a subject but choose not to act on it.

  9. Wikipedia:Quotations and neutrality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quotations_and...

    A naive editor might assume that, given one slightly unbalanced paragraph containing only a hot-tempered quote from a proponent of a viewpoint, the right response is to find a suitably bombastic (or calm, depending on the editor's preferences) counterpoint from someone who holds an opposite view, and insert a quotation of similar length from that source into the article.