Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was an Australian tribunal that conducted independent merits review of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws of the Australian Government. The AAT reviewed decisions made by Australian Government ministers, departments and agencies, and in limited circumstances, decisions made by state ...
The ART was established by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 and commenced operations on 14 October 2024. The intention of creating the ART was to do so in response to recommendations by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee report on the performance and integrity of the administrative review system, published in March 2022. [8]
AAT has played a global role in advocating for greater recognition of accounting technicians. AAT became a full member of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) in 2012 and has since worked with them to develop a framework which outlines the role of an accounting technician in the global accounting profession. [17]
Supreme Court issues decisions on abortion, OxyContin settlement, environmental protection and SEC fraud: A look at today's rulings Kate Murphy June 27, 2024 at 1:38 PM
The AAT was established in 1975, [3] to conduct an independent merits review of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws. The AAT can 'stand in the shoes of the original decision maker' and reconsider the decision using whatever information is brought before it or available to it. [ 4 ]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
However, it is widely felt that most public and private sector housing being built in the 21st Century fails to meet the Parker Morris standards for floor and storage space, and this led to a decision in 2008 by the former government agency English Partnerships to re-introduce minimum standards that are 10% more generous than those of Parker ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.