Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Greatest common divisors can be computed by determining the prime factorizations of the two numbers and comparing factors. For example, to compute gcd(48, 180) , we find the prime factorizations 48 = 2 4 · 3 1 and 180 = 2 2 · 3 2 · 5 1 ; the GCD is then 2 min(4,2) · 3 min(1,2) · 5 min(0,1) = 2 2 · 3 1 · 5 0 = 12 The corresponding LCM is ...
For example, 6 and 35 factor as 6 = 2 × 3 and 35 = 5 × 7, so they are not prime, but their prime factors are different, so 6 and 35 are coprime, with no common factors other than 1. A 24×60 rectangle is covered with ten 12×12 square tiles, where 12 is the GCD of 24 and 60.
s is the sum of the proper divisors of n, including 1 but not n itself; that is, s(n) = σ(n) − n; a deficient number is greater than the sum of its proper divisors; that is, s(n) < n; a perfect number equals the sum of its proper divisors; that is, s(n) = n; an abundant number is lesser than the sum of its proper divisors; that is, s(n) > n
m is a divisor of n (also called m divides n, or n is divisible by m) if all prime factors of m have at least the same multiplicity in n. The divisors of n are all products of some or all prime factors of n (including the empty product 1 of no prime factors). The number of divisors can be computed by increasing all multiplicities by 1 and then ...
A Harshad number in base 10 is an integer that is divisible by the sum of its digits (when written in base 10). A005349: Factorions: 1, 2, 145, 40585, ... A natural number that equals the sum of the factorials of its decimal digits. A014080: Circular primes: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 37, 79, 113, ...
In algebra, the greatest common divisor (frequently abbreviated as GCD) of two polynomials is a polynomial, of the highest possible degree, that is a factor of both the two original polynomials. This concept is analogous to the greatest common divisor of two integers.
The factorizations are often not unique in the sense that the unit could be absorbed into any other factor with exponent equal to one. The entry 4+2i = −i(1+i) 2 (2+i), for example, could also be written as 4+2i= (1+i) 2 (1−2i). The entries in the table resolve this ambiguity by the following convention: the factors are primes in the right ...
In number theory, the prime omega functions and () count the number of prime factors of a natural number . Thereby (little omega) counts each distinct prime factor, whereas the related function () (big omega) counts the total number of prime factors of , honoring their multiplicity (see arithmetic function).