enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ

    Secondary sources are documents or people that summarize other material, usually primary source material. They are academics, journalists, and other researchers, and the papers and books they produce. A theologian's account of what the Bible says is a secondary source. A sociologist thesis based on his research of primary sources is a secondary ...

  3. Help:External links and references - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:External_links_and...

    External links and references are two important elements of Wikipedia that newcomers sometimes find trouble with. This page is designed to cover only the technical aspects of linking and referencing; it is essential that editors also familiarize themselves with Wikipedia:External links, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources, as well as Wikipedia's various other policies ...

  4. Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Perennial_websites

    As a reliable source: * Sometimes. Ancestry.com contains two types of material, which have separate considerations. Official documents such as birth and death records come from reliable sources and can be used provided the restrictions discussed in WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY are obeyed. In all cases, a secondary source is preferred.

  5. Secondary source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_source

    Scipione Amati's History of the Kingdom of Woxu (1615), an example of a secondary source. In scholarship, a secondary source [1] [2] is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. A secondary source contrasts with a primary, or original, source of the information being discussed. A primary ...

  6. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    A primary source can have all of these qualities, and a secondary source may have none of them. Deciding whether primary, secondary or tertiary sources are appropriate on any given occasion is a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense, not merely mindless, knee-jerk reactions to classification of a source as "primary" or "secondary".

  7. Wikipedia:Notability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

    "Sources" [3] should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. [4] Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. Multiple publications from the ...

  8. Wikipedia:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary sources ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_primary...

    Whether a source is primary, secondary or tertiary can depend on the topic that an article is covering. For example, the summary for policy makers from the IPCC is a secondary source for the article Global warming but it would be a primary source if used for the article Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Similarly, a book review in a ...

  9. Wikipedia:Attribution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attribution

    A self-published source is material that has been published by the author, or whose publisher is a vanity press, a web-hosting service, or other organization that provides little or no editorial oversight. Personal websites and messages either on USENET or on Internet bulletin boards are considered self-published.