Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Due to Strong's numbers it became possible to translate concordances from one language into another. Thus, the Russian concordance of 30,000 words from the Russian Thompson Study Bible [2] is a translation of the English concordance from Thompson Chain-Reference Bible. [3]
Another major contribution was to the Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [10] (10 vols., 1867–81; supplement, 2 vols., 1885–7). Work on this project having begun in 1853, Strong was in charge of the department of Biblical literature, while John McClintock supervised theological and ecclesiastical literature for the preparation of the first few volumes.
It was surpassed by three major concordances of the King James Version of the Bible, those of Robert Young, James Strong, and Walker. Others also followed. Others also followed. Young's Analytical Concordance to the Bible (Edinburgh, 1879–84), an almost complete concordance, indicates the Hebrew, Chaldaic , or Greek original of the English ...
Integrated study tools include Gesenius' Lexicon for the Old Testament, and Thayer's Lexicon for the New Testament, as well as English and Strong's Concordances for the entire Bible. Dozens of Biblical commentaries are also available. A series of free instructional videos, titled Introducing the Blue Letter Bible, is available on YouTube. [2]
The full text of Index:A Hebrew and English Lexicon (Brown-Driver-Briggs).djvu at Wikisource.; Concordance and Dictionary – developed by ALHATORAH.ORG, utilizing modified versions of: J. Strong, The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (Cincinnati, 1890); F. Brown, S. R. Driver, and C. A. Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford, 1906); and the work of D. Troidl ...
A concordance is an alphabetical list of the principal words used in a book or body of work, listing every instance of each word with its immediate context.Historically, concordances have been compiled only for works of special importance, such as the Vedas, [1] Bible, Qur'an or the works of Shakespeare, James Joyce or classical Latin and Greek authors, [2] because of the time, difficulty, and ...
Published in 1879, some 268 years after the King James Authorised Version which it indexes, after some 40 years of work including 3 years of typesetting. [2] It was followed in 1894 by Strong's Concordance. Some Bible concordances are single language, e.g. English only, like Cruden's Concordance to the Bible (the first of its kind). They list ...
So, it seems that Cruden's is important historically, but not as popular today as Strong's. The biggest advantage of Strong's may be that every word is assigned a unique number, which is not true for the other ones. I found a phrase that showed up on several pages, "Young’s for the young, Strong’s for the strong, Cruden’s for the crude".