Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A game whose outcome (win, lose or draw) can be correctly predicted assuming perfect play from all players. Value A value of a game is a rationally expected outcome. There are more than a few definitions of value, describing different methods of obtaining a solution to the game. Veto
Parrondo's paradox is used extensively in game theory, and its application to engineering, population dynamics, [3] financial risk, etc., are areas of active research. Parrondo's games are of little practical use such as for investing in stock markets [ 10 ] as the original games require the payoff from at least one of the interacting games to ...
A straightforward example of maximizing payoff is that of monetary gain, but for the purpose of a game theory analysis, this payoff can take any desired outcome—cash reward, minimization of exertion or discomfort, or promoting justice can all be modeled as amassing an overall “utility” for the player.
Game theory is the study of mathematical models of strategic interactions. [1] It has applications in many fields of social science, and is used extensively in ...
An example of a non-credible threat is demonstrated by Shaorong Sun & Na Sun in their book Management Game Theory. The example game, the market entry game, describes a situation in which an existing firm, firm 2, has a strong hold on the market and a new firm, firm 1, is considering entering. If firm 1 doesn’t enter, the payoff is (4,10).
Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work [1] is a book written by political science professor George Tsebelis in 2002. It is a game theory analysis of political behavior. . In this work Tsebelis uses the concept of the veto player as a tool for analysing the outcomes of political syste
The revelation principle is a fundamental result in mechanism design, social choice theory, and game theory which shows it is always possible to design a strategy-resistant implementation of a social decision-making mechanism (such as an electoral system or market). [1] It can be seen as a kind of mirror image to Gibbard's theorem.
So whereas game theory looks on an interaction as a single decision matrix and resolves that, confrontation analysis looks on the interaction as a sequence of linked interactions, where the decision matrix changes under the influence of precisely defined emotional dilemmas.