Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
RFC 1, titled "Host Software", was written by Steve Crocker of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and published on April 7, 1969. [10] Although written by Steve Crocker, the RFC had emerged from an early working group discussion between Steve Crocker, Steve Carr, and Jeff Rulifson. In RFC 3, which first defined the RFC series ...
RFC 1067, RFC 1098, RFC 1157 (v.1), RFC 1441 (v.2) RFC 2570 (v.3) Stream Control Transmission Protocol: RFC 2960, RFC 4960, RFC 3286 Tag URI scheme: RFC 4151 TELNET: RFC 15, RFC 854, RFC 855 Transmission Control Protocol: RFC 675, RFC 793, RFC 9293 Transport Layer Security 1.0: RFC 2246 Trivial File Transfer Protocol: RFC 783, RFC 1350 Usenet ...
[79] [80] This practice of publishing April Fool's Day RFCs is specifically acknowledged in the instructions memo for RFC authors, with a tongue-in-cheek note saying: "Note that in past years the RFC Editor has sometimes published serious documents with April 1 dates. Readers who cannot distinguish satire by reading the text may have a future ...
RFC 1945 HTTP/1.0; RFC 9110 HTTP Semantics; RFC 9111 HTTP Caching; RFC 9112 HTTP/1.1; RFC 9113 HTTP/2; RFC 7541 HTTP/2: HPACK Header Compression; RFC 8164 HTTP/2: Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2; RFC 8336 HTTP/2: The ORIGIN HTTP/2 Frame; RFC 8441 HTTP/2: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2; RFC 9114 HTTP/3; RFC 9204 HTTP/3: QPACK: Field ...
The final revised documentation for PDF 1.7 was approved by ISO Technical Committee 171 in January 2008 and published as ISO 32000-1:2008 on July 1, 2008, and titled Document management – Portable document format – Part 1: PDF 1.7. ISO 32000-1:2008 is the first ISO standard for full function PDF.
The aim of RfC discussions is to improve the encyclopedia, and they may relate to article content pages, editorial disputes; changes to policies, guidelines, or procedures; or other topics. An RfC invites comment from a broader selection of editors than a local talk page discussion.
The PDF 1.4 specification allowed form submissions in XML format, but this was replaced by submissions in XFDF format in the PDF 1.5 specification. XFDF conforms to the XML standard. XFDF can be used in the same way as FDF; e.g., form data is submitted to a server, modifications are made, then sent back and the new form data is imported in an ...
For example, in 2007 RFC 3700 was an Internet Standard (STD 1) and in May 2008 it was replaced with RFC 5000. RFC 3700 received Historic status, and RFC 5000 became STD 1. The list of Internet standards was originally published as STD 1 but this practice has been abandoned in favor of an online list maintained by the RFC Editor. [18]