Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is an important distinction made of human communication, i.e. language as compared to animal communication. While animal communication can display a few other design features as proposed by Hockett, animal communication is unable to lie or make up something that does not exist or have referents.
Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language. In other words, it is how human beings gain the ability to be aware of language, to understand it, and to produce and use words and sentences to communicate. Language acquisition involves structures, rules, and representation.
Research in communication strategies reached its peak in the 1980s, and has since fallen out of favor as a research topic in second-language acquisition. Some researchers who have studied communication strategies and their effect on language acquisition include Elaine Tarone, Claus Faerch, Gabriele Kasper, and Ellen Bialystok. [3]
From the standpoint of traditional transmission where language manifests as a socially learned, culturally transmitted system, language acquisition is mechanical and is directly affected by the present environment the individual is placed in. This removes the premise of language acquisition from that of a biological construct.
Some experts argue the following properties separate human language from animal communication: [5] Arbitrariness: There is usually no rational relationship between a sound or sign and its meaning. [6] For example, there is nothing intrinsically house-like about the word "house". Discreteness: Language is composed of small, separate, and ...
Acceleration is the acquisition of a feature in language A facilitating the acquisition of a feature in language B. [7] In a study of Dutch-English bilingual children, there were no instances of transfer across elements of morphology and syntactic development, indicating that the two languages developed separately from each other. [8]
X. Fang and J. Xue-mei (2007) pointed out that contrastive analysis hypothesis claimed that the principal barrier to second language acquisition is the interference of the first language system with the second language system and that a scientific, structural comparison of the two languages in question would enable people to predict and ...
An example of this would involve how communication interactions with men will often involve them using interruptions as a controlling communication behavior. [42] However, one study found that "people accommodate their conversants' speech style (more man-like or woman-like) more than to their actual gender". [ 43 ]