enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisville_&_Nashville...

    Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that under the existing statutory scheme, federal question jurisdiction could not be predicated on a plaintiff's anticipation that the defendant would raise a federal statute as a defense.

  3. Illinois Court of Claims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Court_of_Claims

    The Illinois Secretary of State serves as the ex-officio Clerk of the Court of Claims. [3] Judges on the Court of Claims are appointed by the Governor of Illinois and confirmed by the Illinois Senate. In 1987, state legislation increased the number of judges on the Illinois Court of Claims from five judges to seven judges. [4]

  4. Pleading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleading

    Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure a complaint is the first pleading in American law filed by a plaintiff which initiates a lawsuit. [1] A complaint sets forth the relevant allegations of fact that give rise to one or more legal causes of action along with a prayer for relief and sometimes a statement of damages claimed (an ad quod damnum clause).

  5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT ...

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-08-05-Joliet...

    in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and the property which is the subject of this lawsuit is located in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. DEFENDANT 4.

  6. National Environmental Policy Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Environmental...

    This is referred to as the "well-pleaded" complaint rule. Parts of a complaint requesting removal of anticipated construction can be ignored by Federal courts since construction was not an actual controversy at the time the complaint was filed. Therefore, if project construction starts after a NEPA complaint is filed, the NEPA complaint will ...

  7. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure.Authored by Justice David Souter, it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  8. Did an Illinois firefighter have a secret he was willing to ...

    www.aol.com/did-illinois-firefighter-secret...

    When Melissa Lamesch is found dead at home in Mt. Morris, Illinois, on the day before Thanksgiving, authorities zero in on Matthew Plote, a man trained to save lives, not take them.

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Fuller Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Police power supersedes freedom of religion in matters of public health; vaccination requirements are constitutional Rasmussen v. United States: 197 U.S. 516 (1905) sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases: Lochner v. New York: 198 U.S. 45 (1905) freedom of contract, substantive due process Harris v. Balk: 198 U.S. 215 (1905) quasi in rem ...