Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Status of Social Media Age Verification laws in the United States. In 2022 California passed The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act or AB 2273 which requires websites that are likely to be used by minors to estimate visitors ages to give them some amount of privacy control and on March 23, 2023, Utah Governor Spencer Cox signed SB 152 and HB 311 collective known as the Utah Social ...
Date introduced Sponsor(s) # of cosponsors Latest status 117th Congress: Kids Online Safety Act of 2022 S.3663: February 16, 2022 Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) 13 Referred to committees of jurisdiction, but never saw a floor vote. 118th Congress: Kids Online Safety Act of 2023 H.R.7891: April 19, 2023 Gus M. Bilirakis (R-FL) 64
OK2Say received 9,686 tips in 2023, the most for the program in a single year and up 31% from 2022. Michigan students reported record number of bullying, assault, self-harm incidents in 2023 Skip ...
Actively marketing their service to kids despite being aware of the harms from similar services. Families have sued other apps saying their children committed suicide after being bullied on them.
In total, there are 225 children’s hospitals on the map. Do No Harm, ... among the states with the most gender-affirming care. 1,154 minor New Yorkers were sex change patients between 2019 and 2023.
[342] [343] Haaretz reported in December 2023 that "no children 6 or 7 or near those ages were killed on Be'eri". [329] The Intercept similarly said no one killed in Be'eri matched this account and expressed mystification that U.S. media kept citing ZAKA, even though their testimony was debunked in Israeli media. [344]
Reflecting on the year’s events, the head of region for Europe and the Middle East at the British Red Cross told the PA news agency: “2023 has seen human devastation on an unprecedented scale.
Montana alleges harm under Montana's state constitution. [102] In 2023 a District Court ruled that the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) that prohibited the state from considering greenhouse gas emissions was a violation of the "Plaintiffs' right to a clean and healthful environment and is facially unconstitutional". [103]