Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Mainstream commentators accept that news value drives selection of stories, but there is some debate as to whether catering to an audience's level of interest in a story makes the selection process non-objective. [6] Another example of an objection to objectivity, according to communication scholar David Mindich, was the coverage that the major ...
Examples include bias introduced by the ownership of media, including a concentration of media ownership, the subjective selection of staff, or the perceived preferences of an intended audience. Assessing possible bias is one aspect of media literacy , which is studied at schools of journalism, university departments (including media studies ...
In journalism, neutrality is generally seen to be met by giving all sides of an issue equal treatment.This is the view that has come to be held as the most neutral view by the populace at large as well, due to the fact that the larger population is exposed more to journalism than any other form of documentary media.
Such examples have been dramatized in fact-based movie dramas such as Good Night, and Good Luck and The Insider and demonstrated in the documentary The Corporation. [ 52 ] [ 53 ] George Orwell originally wrote a preface for his 1945 novel Animal Farm , which pointed up the self-censorship during wartime when the Soviet Union was an ally.
Objectivity as a journalistic standard varies to some degree depending on the industry and country. For example, the government-funded BBC in the United Kingdom places a strong emphasis on political neutrality, but British newspapers more often tend to adopt political affiliations or leanings in both coverage and audience, sometimes explicitly ...
Hallin's spheres: sphere of consensus, sphere of controversy and sphere of deviance. Hallin's spheres is a theory of news reporting and its rhetorical framing posited by journalism historian Daniel C. Hallin in his 1986 book The Uncensored War to explain the news coverage of the Vietnam War. [1]
Supporters argue the change is necessary to protect net neutrality — though can’t seem to find any evidence or examples of internet providers blocking or discriminating against any lawful traffic.
Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. [6]