enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Citation Year Vote Classification Subject Matter Opinions Statute Interpreted Summary; Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company: 188 U.S. 239: 1903: 7–2: Substantive

  3. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Seagate two-part test that required both objective and subjective bases is overruled. This case reviewed both Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., both of which used the Seagate two-part test to determine willful infringement as the basis for deciding enhanced damages per Section 284.

  4. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Pesos,_Inc._v._Taco...

    One year later, Taco Cabana sued Two Pesos in federal district court for trade dress infringement under the Lanham Act and for theft of trade secrets under Texas common law. [10] Both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed that Two Pesos deliberately infringed upon Taco Cabana's trade dress, and ...

  5. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sec_v._texas_gulf_sulphur_co.

    Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. [1] is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which articulated standards for a number of aspects of insider trading law under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. In particular, it set out standards for materiality of inside information, effective disclosure of ...

  6. Myers v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_v._United_States

    Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body. It was distinguished in 1935 by Humphrey's Executor v. United States. However, in Seila Law

  7. Autry Stephens sold his company for $26 billion but died ...

    www.aol.com/autry-stephens-sold-company-26...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Passenger Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_Cases

    Smith v. Turner; Norris v. Boston, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 283 (1849), [1] were two similar cases, argued together before the United States Supreme Court, which decided 5–4 that states do not have the right to impose a tax that is determined by the number of passengers of a designated category on board a ship and/or disembarking into the State.

  9. Stephens makes fact-challenged case for HB 1146 to enable ...

    www.aol.com/stevens-makes-fact-challenged-case...

    Stephens makes fact-challenged case for HB 1146 to enable private water utilities in state. Gannett. John Deem, Savannah Morning News. March 11, 2024 at 12:54 PM.