Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983), commonly known in U.S. administrative law as State Farm, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the due process clause usually limits punitive damage awards to less than ten times the size of the compensatory damages awarded and that punitive damage awards of four times the compensatory damage award is "close to the line of constitutional impropriety".
Federal law prohibits any person who is subject to a state protective order from possessing a firearm, [23] provided that the protected party is an intimate partner, meaning a spouse or former spouse, or a person with whom the protected party has had a child. [24] Violating a restraining order is a deportable offense. [citation needed]
Myth #1: The legally required minimum coverage is all you need. Buying only your state's minimum required auto insurance might seem like a smart way to save money, but this approach could end up ...
The attorneys claimed in the filing that the defendants “have not responded to Plaintiff’s efforts at obtaining agreement” on a proposed protective order. The student’s attorneys said on ...
Such an order may later be overturned or vacated during the litigation; or it may become a final order and judgment, subject then to appeal. In the area of domestic violence, U.S. courts will routinely issue a temporary order of protection (TOP) (or temporary protective order, TPO) to prevent any further violence or threat of violence.
Telling his attorneys to take “special care” that Mr Trump heeds her words on this issue, she added that she will enact “whatever measures are necessary” to make sure that there’s ...
In State Farm Auto. Ins. v. Campbell (2003), the Supreme Court held that punitive damages might only be based on the acts of the defendants which harmed the plaintiffs. The court also elaborated on the factors courts must apply when reviewing a punitive award under due process principles.