enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Core content policies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Core_content...

    Neutral point of view – All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately and without bias. Verifiability ( WP:V ) – Material challenged or likely to be challenged , and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source.

  3. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text or content is published or otherwise disseminated. Internal fact-checking is such checking done in-house by the publisher to prevent inaccurate content from being published; when the text is analyzed by a third party, the process is called external fact-checking. [1]

  4. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

    Editors, while naturally having their own points of view, should strive in good faith to provide complete information and not to promote one particular point of view over another. As such, the neutral point of view does not mean the exclusion of certain points of view; rather, it means including all verifiable points of view which have ...

  5. Wikipedia:Article point of view vs NPOV - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_point_of...

    Some articles by definition, express a point of view, in which case I propose that a neutral point of view (NPOV), has a slightly different meaning as follows: . For a general article: (existing policy) Neutral Point of View means as described in policy, and loosely means to (a) provide a balanced article in (b) a neutral manner.

  6. Wikipedia:Describing points of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Describing...

    At Wikipedia, points of view (POVs) – cognitive perspectives – are often essential to articles which treat controversial subjects. Wikipedia's official "Neutral Point of View" (NPOV) policy does not mean that all the POVs of all the Wikipedia editors have to be represented. Rather, the article should represent the POVs of the main scholars ...

  7. Wikipedia and fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking

    Mike Caulfield and Sam Wineburg adapt an approach to fact checking as a type of media literacy, suggesting that information seekers emphasize lateral reading (or skimming multiple reliable sources instead of thoroughly examining one), including by using Wikipedia as a starting point for learning about a topic. [14]

  8. Wikipedia : Neutral point of view/FAQ

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    Because the neutral point of view policy is often unfamiliar to newcomers yet central to Wikipedia's approach, many issues surrounding the neutrality policy have been covered extensively before. If you have some new contribution to make to the debate, you could try Talk:Neutral point of view, or bring it up on the Wikipedia mailing list. Before ...

  9. Wikipedia : NPOV means neutral editing, not neutral content

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_means...

    NPOV (Neutral Point of View) is our most sacred policy, yet its use of the word "neutral" is constantly misunderstood by editors and visitors who feel that NPOV occupies some sort of "No Point Of View" middle ground between biased points of view. Points of view and criticisms are by nature not neutral, and all types of biased points of view ...