enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Matthean Posteriority hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthean_Posteriority...

    Gottlob Christian Storr, in his 1786 argument for Marcan priority, [1] asked, if Mark was a source for Matthew and Luke, how the latter two were then related. Storr proposed, among other possibilities, that the canonical Matthew (written in Greek) was translated from the original, which was written in either Hebrew or Aramaic (the logia spoken of by Papias) by following Mark primarily but also ...

  3. Two-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-source_hypothesis

    The 2SH explains the features of the triple tradition by proposing that both Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source. Mark appears more 'primitive': his diction and grammar are less literary than Matthew and Luke, his language is more prone to redundancy and obscurity, his Christology is less supernatural, and he makes more frequent use of ...

  4. Matt Penney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Penney

    Matthew Luke Penney (born 11 February 1998) is an English professional footballer who plays as a full back or midfielder for National League side Rochdale.. Penney joined Sheffield Wednesday in 2006, progressing through the club's academy to make his senior debut in August 2018.

  5. Matthew Luke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Luke

    Matthew Luke (died 1722, occasionally named Mateo Luque or Matteo Luca) [1] was a pirate and privateer active in the Caribbean. History.

  6. Marcan priority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

    Mark nearly always follows Matthew and Luke where they agree in order and one or the other when they disagree. On the other hand, the double tradition pericopae shared between Matthew and Luke show little agreement in order. [49] Such observations have been studied in detail for centuries, but the difficulty has been in how to interpret them. [50]

  7. Synoptic Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels

    Over three-quarters of Mark's content is found in both Matthew and Luke, and 97% of Mark is found in at least one of the other two synoptic gospels. Additionally, Matthew (24%) and Luke (23%) have material in common that is not found in Mark. [1] The calming of the storm is recounted in each of the three synoptic gospels, but not in John.

  8. Four-document hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-document_hypothesis

    The four-document hypothesis or four-source hypothesis is an explanation for the relationship between the three Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.It posits that there were at least four sources to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke: the Gospel of Mark and three lost sources (Q, M, and L).

  9. L source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L_source

    The hypothetical L source fits a contemporary solution in which Mark was the first gospel and Q was a written source for both Matthew and Luke. According to the four-document hypothesis , the author combined Mark , the Q source , and L to produce his gospel. [ 1 ]