Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[10] [11] [12] Google states that they wanted more control in order to open source the language and allow third parties to take better advantage of its code; [10] Oracle states that Sun refused because Google's intention was essentially to fork Java to a Google version of the language, and to prevent it being inter-operable with other versions ...
A few months ago, Oracle (ORCL) rocked the Internet world by suing Google for patent infringement based on the Android system's use of Java. The suit was surprising for a few reasons: The Java ...
The plea submitted by Google that MADAs pre-installation conditions are not exclusive or exclusionary, can also be properly examined during the investigation. [20] It was held Google has a dominant position in the mobile operating system market. Google's Android holds 80 per cent of India's mobile operating system market. [16]
Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023), was a case at the Supreme Court of the United States which dealt with the question of whether or not recommender systems are covered by liability exemptions under section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was established by section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, for Internet service providers (ISPs) in dealing with terrorism ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The old line software companies like Microsoft (MSFT) and Oracle (ORCL) have always favored the idea of their products running on their customers' computers and servers. The notion of "remote ...
Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González was a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union holding that an internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal information which appears on web pages published by third parties.
Google argued that since Viacom and its lawyers were "unable to recognize that dozens of the clips alleged as infringements in this case were uploaded to YouTube" with Viacom's express authorization, "it was unreasonable to expect Google's employees to know which videos were uploaded without permission." [16] [17]