Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect", by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the article topic. [2] Reviewers should aim to advise on content and form rather than to impose their preferences.
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
Choose an article that you would like to review. Start the review by following the start review link appearing on the GA nominations page or near the top of the article talk page. A new GA review page will be created. You may add opening remarks, an initial review, or one of these templates to the bottom of this review page. [f] Save the page.
If the article does not meet the Good article criteria after the reviewer has waited a reasonable amount of time for the nominator to make improvements, the reviewer is sure to fail the nomination. Future article editors may benefit from review comments on how to improve the article. The nominator disagrees with the reviewer.
Reviewing new articles; Peer review, a process for receiving ideas and feedback from other editors about articles; Featured article review and Good article reassessment, information about reviewing Featured Articles and Good Articles to see if they still qualify for that status; Specific user groups which mention reviewing include: Pending ...
Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor.
For example, doing spot-checks of the cited sources to ensure they verify the information in the article and look out for possible plagiarism of the sources. Earwig's tool can help with the latter. In addition to the prose review, a review of the sources will go a long way to make doubly sure an article meets all the criteria.
If the article is promoted, a small plus sign inside a circle () will appear on the top right corner of the article's page indicating that the article is good. To nominate or review an article, follow the instructions. Similarly, to delist an article which no longer meets the good article criteria, follow the instructions for reassessment.