Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The fallacy of division [1] is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. An example: The second grade in Jefferson Elementary eats a lot of ice cream; Carlos is a second-grader in Jefferson Elementary; Therefore, Carlos eats a lot of ice cream
Naturalistic fallacy fallacy is a type of argument from fallacy. Straw man fallacy – refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [110] Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data. [111]
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Accident (fallacy) And you are lynching Negroes; ... Fallacy of division; G. Gambler's fallacy;
In mathematics, certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept called mathematical fallacy.There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof, in that a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof while in the best-known examples of mathematical fallacies there is some element of concealment or ...
The fallacy of division is committed if one infers from the sentence in the collective sense that one specific individual is strong enough. [12] [24] The fallacy of composition is committed if one infers from the fact that each member of a group has a property that the group as a whole has this property. [24]
division See fallacy of division. domain The set of all possible inputs for a function, or more generally, the subject matter or universe of discourse in a logical argument. domain of discourse The collection of objects being discussed in a particular logical context, which determines the range of quantifiers. dominant connective
Fallacy of denying the antecedent; Fallacy of distribution; Fallacy of division; Fallacy of equivocation; Fallacy of exclusive premises; Fallacy of false cause; Fallacy of four terms; Fallacy of hasty generalization; Fallacy of irrelevant conclusion; Fallacy of many questions; Fallacy of misplaced concreteness; Fallacy of necessity; Fallacy of ...
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments [1] is a textbook on logical fallacies by T. Edward Damer that has been used for many years in a number of college courses on logic, critical thinking, argumentation, and philosophy. It explains 60 of the most commonly committed fallacies.