Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Mead sold Lexis, and Illinois maintained that Mead must pay them a proportionate capital-gains tax. [3] Illinois asserted that Mead and Lexis were integrated to the extent required for the "unitary business rule". [4] This rule allowed states to tax a proportionate share of the value generated by an interstate corporation. [5]
The Supreme Court overturned the ruling of the Illinois courts. Justice William Rehnquist delivered the decision in favor of the State of Illinois. Justice Rehnquist stated: We agree with the Illinois Supreme Court that an informant's "veracity," "reliability" and "basis of knowledge" are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report.
Months earlier, in a case cited in this decision, In re Anglin, 122 Ill.2d 531, 525 N.E.2d 550 (May 18, 1988), the Illinois Supreme Court refused to reinstate the law license of an attorney convicted of (among other felonies) possessing stolen securities, and who wished to be reinstated while continuing to withhold the name of the person or ...
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. [1]
Case name Citation Date decided Gilligan v. Morgan: 413 U.S. 1: 1973: Miller v. California: 413 U.S. 15: 1973: Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton: 413 U.S. 49
Case name Citation Date decided Leiman v. Guttman: 336 U.S. 1: 1949: La Crosse Tel. Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd. 336 U.S. 18: 1949: Commissioner v.
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...