Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As far as the province of Manitoba is concerned, section 5 of the Charter replaced section 20 of the Manitoba Act, which was also repealed in 1982. Section 5 still co-exists with section 86 of the Constitution Act, 1867, which requires annual sessions for the legislatures of the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
Section 16.1 (pronounced "sixteen point one") is not to be confused with subsection 16(1) ("sixteen one"), which is part of section 16 and was part of the original 1982 text. Section 16.1 is a separate section; [ 1 ] the "point one" numbering indicates that this new section was added between two existing sections without renumbering them.
[4] [5] The sufficiency of the disclosure, with any valid amendments made to it, is judged at the patent's claim date. [5] The disclosure must be fair, honest, open and sufficient. [5] If a person skilled in the art can arrive at the same results only through chance or further long experiments, the disclosure is insufficient and the patent is ...
Section 16 itself expands upon language rights in the Constitution Act, 1867; whereas section 133 of the Constitution Act, 1867 merely allowed for both languages to be used in the Parliament of Canada and in the Quebec legislature, and in some courts, section 16 goes further by allowing bilingualism in the federal and New Brunswick ...
The Queen, (1989), [4] in which it was found that the Department of Fisheries violated section 20 by providing English-only services, (1) by simply presuming there was no need for French services, (2) because there were penal consequences for anyone who disobeyed the law not provided in French, and (3) even though some French Canadians ...
The Constitution Act, 1867, is part of the Constitution of Canada and thus part of the supreme law of Canada. [1] [2] It was the product of extensive negotiations by the governments of the British North American provinces in the 1860s. [3] [4] Following those conferences, there were consultations with the British government in 1867.
Section 2(g) of this Act read that a person has a right to "the assistance of an interpreter in any proceedings in which he is involved or in which he is a party or a witness, before a court, commission, board or other tribunal, if he does not understand or speak the language in which such proceedings are conducted."
Provisions similar to s. 210 of the UK Companies Act 1948 were first introduced into Canadian law through the 1975 passage of the Canada Business Corporations Act. [1] It incorporated recommendations made in 1962 by the UK Jenkins Committee on Company Law for removing the linkage of the remedy with that of winding-up and for broadening its scope. [2]