Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Book reviews are often a mix of primary and secondary material: e.g., an analysis of some aspect of the book (secondary) plus the reviewer's rating or opinion about the book (primary). Simple plot summaries, synopses, other basic descriptions of a work's contents are generally primary sources.
Moreover, the distinction between primary and secondary sources is subjective and contextual, [19] so that precise definitions are difficult to make. [20] A book review, when it contains the opinion of the reviewer about the book rather than a summary of the book, becomes a primary source. [21] [22]
A book review that contains the judgment of the reviewer about the book is a primary source for the reviewer's opinion, and a secondary source for the contents of the book. [18] [19] A summary of the book within a review is a secondary source.
They have been distinguished from secondary sources, which often cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources. [6] They serve as an original source of information or new ideas about the topic. Primary and secondary, however, are relative terms, and any given source may be classified as primary or secondary, depending on how it is used. [7]
Tertiary sources are publications such as encyclopedias or other compendia that sum up secondary and primary sources. For example, Wikipedia itself is a tertiary source. Many introductory textbooks may also be considered tertiary to the extent that they sum up multiple primary and secondary sources.
Secondary sources are at least one step removed from an event. They rely for their material on primary sources, often making analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims. [4] [5] [6] Secondary sources include books, newspaper reports, reviews of films etc. and many academic papers, although this always depends on the ...
This is saying two things: one, that primary vs. secondary as it applies to books and media articles is less a matter of what the sources are than how they are used; and two, that the distinction has to do with context and cultural factors, as anything written in the 1930s about slavery -- even a scholarly source that is doing some ...
A tertiary source is an index or textual consolidation of already published primary and secondary sources [1] that does not provide additional interpretations or analysis of the sources. [2] [3] Some tertiary sources can be used as an aid to find key (seminal) sources, key terms, general common knowledge [4] and established mainstream science on a