enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stanford Web Credibility Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Web_Credibility...

    A total of one hundred sites were assessed. This study was launched jointly with a parallel, expert-focused project conducted by Sliced Bread Design, LLC. In their study, Experts vs. Online Consumers: A Comparative Credibility Study of Health and Finance Web Sites, fifteen health and finance experts were asked to assess the credibility of the ...

  3. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    International scientific open access bibliography for theology and religious studies. The IxTheo lists monographs, collected works, journals, essays, encyclopaedia articles, reviews as well as databases, archive materials, literary remains, blogs, podcasts, research data and other electronically available content from all fields of theology.

  4. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  5. Source credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_credibility

    Source credibility is "a term commonly used to imply a communicator's positive characteristics that affect the receiver's acceptance of a message." [1] Academic studies of this topic began in the 20th century and were given a special emphasis during World War II, when the US government sought to use propaganda to influence public opinion in support of the war effort.

  6. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing...

    Particularly if there are few sources listed, it is a good idea to scan those sources to see if they are reliable. Unreliable sources include most blogs and personal websites, although some of these are reliable. Reliable sources include most newspaper and magazine articles, online encyclopedias, and other professional publications such as books.

  7. Google Scholar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar

    Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...

  8. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Isolated studies – Isolated studies are usually considered tentative and may change in the light of further academic research. If the isolated study is a primary source, it should generally not be used if there are secondary sources that cover the same content. The reliability of a single study depends on the field.

  9. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    She wanted to give students an easier way to determine what sources are credible. [2] One of the other tests that came before the CRAAP test is the SAILS test: S tandardized A ssessment of I nformation L iteracy S kills, created in 2002 by a group of librarians at Kent State University as an assessment for students' information literacy skills.