Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The organization initially offered low licensing fees to foster a partnership between the fledgling medium and ASCAP; however, the licensing fees increased 900 percent between 1931 and 1939. ASCAP said the increases were due to radio curtailing the ability of its members to make money through other venues, such as sheet music and record sales ...
Lorimar Music A Corp. (ASCAP) Lorimar Music Bee Corp. (BMI) New Line Melodies (SESAC) New Line Music Corp. (BMI) New Line Tunes (ASCAP) T-L Music Publishing Company, Inc. Eleven Hundred Music (SESAC) L-T Music Publishing (BMI) T-L Music Publishing (ASCAP) Turner Music Publishing Inc. RET Music, Inc. (ASCAP) Super Satellite Music (BMI) Techwood ...
In 1939, ASCAP announced a substantial increase in the revenue share licensees would be required to pay. BMI was founded by the National Association of Broadcasters to provide a lower-cost alternative to ASCAP. [7] [8] As such, BMI created competition in the field of performing rights, providing an alternative source of licensing for all music ...
ASCAP's and SESAC's policy of charging non-commercial educational (NCE) radio stations for playing copyrighted music has also been criticised, especially by college radio stations across the U.S., which rely entirely on student and listener support for funding and have difficulty affording the extra fees. Community Orchestras, which mostly play ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Between the two organizations, the database accounts for more than 20 million musical works and includes a breakdown of shares by ASCAP and BMI. Music Rights Organizations ASCAP and BMI Join ...
The Radio Music License Committee, a trade group representing radio stations in the U.S., has filed a petition in the Federal Southern District of New York to hold consolidated rate proceedings ...
The district court first established that downloads did not constitute performances, later establishing a method for computing fees owed to ASCAP by Yahoo! and RealNetworks. The district court adopted a simple formula of a 2.5% royalty rate multiplied by the amount of revenue generated by the performance of musical works from ASCAP's repertory.