Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R v Ryan [2013] SCC 3 is a case ... Michael Ryan. At trial, the trial judge accepted she was subject to such abuse. The husband was never called to testify. In ...
R v Sanichar 2013 SCC 4 : Whether appellate court erred in setting aside convictions and ordering a new trial – – R v Taylor 2013 SCC 10 : Whether trial judge erred in rejecting evidence – Cromwell J (oral) R v Levkovic 2013 SCC 25 : Constitutional challenge of s. 243 of the Criminal Code under s. 7 of the Charter on grounds of vagueness ...
Ryan v The Queen (abbreviated to Ryan v R) is a seminal case in Australian criminal law. The case is an application to the High Court of Australia for special leave to appeal a conviction for murder. It is often cited in cases of felony murder (referred to as constructive murder in Australian law) and when the issue of voluntariness is in question.
The candidates to become Vanderburgh County's next circuit court judge sat down with the Courier & Press to discuss what they’ll bring to the bench.
Oakland County Probate Judge Kathleen Ryan was removed from her docket on Aug. 27 for unspecified misconduct. Now the court’s administrator has stepped forward to say he blew the whistle on her ...
R v Pan; R v Sawyer, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 344 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal jury trial system. The Court held that rules against admitting evidence indicating the decision-making process of a jury were constitutional.
A Florida judge has fast-tracked the trial for would-be Trump assassin Ryan Wesley Routh -- setting it for just two weeks after the presidential election.
The trial judge held that while Bissonnette's crimes were serious, a 150-year parole ineligibility period was far too excessive. He held that an appropriate parole ineligibility period for the offender in the case would be between 35 and 42 years, but noted that the provision restricted him to at least 50 years of ineligibility if he were to ...