enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court scales back clean water protections. What does ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-scales-back-clean...

    As a Supreme Court ruling scales back federal water protections, a top California water regulator says the state will maintain stringent oversight of wetlands.

  3. Supreme Court limits EPA protection for wetlands, favoring ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-limits-epa...

    In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court limits federal protection for wetlands in a property rights case, saying the Clean Water Act does not usually apply to the marshy areas.

  4. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  5. Supreme Court rules on wetlands. Here’s how it affects ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-wetlands...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. City and County of San Francisco v. EPA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_and_County_of_San...

    City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without ...

  7. Sheetz v. County of El Dorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheetz_v._County_of_El_Dorado

    Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (Docket No. 22-1074) is a United States Supreme Court case regarding permit exactions under the Takings Clause.The Supreme Court held, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, that fees for land-use permits must be closely related and roughly proportional to the effects of the land use – the test established by Nollan v.

  8. States at the forefront of fights over wetlands protections ...

    www.aol.com/news/states-forefront-fights-over...

    A month after the U.S. Supreme Court severely restricted the federal government's power to oversee wetlands, the Republican-dominated North Carolina legislature handed state agencies an order: Don ...

  9. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    Arizona v. California is a set of United States Supreme Court cases, all dealing with disputes over water distribution from the Colorado River between the states of Arizona and California. It also covers the amount of water that the State of Nevada receives from the river as well.