enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_Wolf_v._Hitchcock

    Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553 (1903), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case brought against the US government by the Kiowa chief Lone Wolf, who charged that Native American tribes under the Medicine Lodge Treaty had been defrauded of land by Congressional actions in violation of the treaty.

  3. Tribal sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the...

    Territorial sovereignty: Tribal authority on Indian land is organic and is not granted by the states in which Indian lands are located. Plenary power doctrine: Congress, and not the Executive Branch or Judicial Branch, has ultimate authority with regard to matters affecting the Indian tribes. Federal courts give greater deference to Congress on ...

  4. Plenary power - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plenary_power

    The Congress may create and charter, through the enactment of statutes, corporate bodies (Federal Corporations) which can be granted (through the Congress' plenary power to legislate) derivative (derived from the legislation, as opposed to the Constitution itself) plenary power(s) in areas that are defined by statute and which comport with the constitution.

  5. A Century of Citizenship: Views from Wind River Reservation ...

    www.aol.com/news/century-citizenship-views-wind...

    He also takes issue with the authority the U.S. government holds over Native Americans, known as “plenary power,” defined as “complete or absolute authority granted to a governing body ...

  6. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    This case was the beginning of the plenary power legal doctrine that has been used in Indian case law to limit tribal sovereignty. Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) An Indian cannot make himself a citizen of the United States without the consent and the co-operation of the United States Federal government. United States v.

  7. United States v. Nice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nice

    The court's decision continued the contradictory treatment of Native Americans with the incongruous ideas of Indians as dependent people in need of protection and Indians as United States Citizens. [11] United States v. Nice upheld the plenary power of Congress. The nearly unlimited power of Congress to adjust Indian rights still exists today.

  8. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_Pueblo_v._Martinez

    Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978), was a landmark case in the area of federal Indian law involving issues of great importance to the meaning of tribal sovereignty in the contemporary United States.

  9. Admission to the Union - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admission_to_the_Union

    In 1905, leaders of the Five Civilized Tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole) in Indian Territory proposed to establish the state of Sequoyah as a means to retain control of their lands. [18] The proposed constitution ultimately failed in Congress. Instead, the Indian Territory was incorporated into the new state of Oklahoma ...