enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sarbanes–Oxley Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SarbanesOxley_Act

    The SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations.The act, Pub. L. 107–204 (text), 116 Stat. 745, enacted July 30, 2002, also known as the "Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act" (in the Senate) and "Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and ...

  3. Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_v._UBS_Securities,_LLC

    In 2002, the United States Congress enacted the SarbanesOxley Act (SOX). Passed in the aftermath of various major corporate accounting scandals (including Enron and WorldCom) SOX mandated certain financial record keeping and reporting practices for corporations. The Act imposes responsibilities upon a public corporation's board of directors ...

  4. Yates v. United States (2015) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates_v._United_States_(2015)

    Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court construed 18 U.S.C. § 1519, a provision added to the federal criminal code by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to criminalize the destruction or concealment of "any record, document, or tangible object" to obstruct a federal investigation. [1]

  5. UBS whistleblower verdict thrown out despite US Supreme ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/ubs-whistleblower-verdict...

    He said UBS's conduct violated the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance law. UBS said it fired Murray as part of a broader cost-cutting that included thousands of job losses, following a $2 billion ...

  6. US SEC case over massive Allen Stanford fraud ends, judge ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-sec-case-over-massive...

    A federal judge ordered an end to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's 16-year-old lawsuit over Allen Stanford's $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme, directing the financier and two former ...

  7. Fraud Files: How Well Does Sarbanes-Oxley Reduce Fraud ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-07-16-fraud-files-how-well...

    Yet there is no real evidence that fraud risk or actual fraud has been reduced because of Sarbanes-Oxley. The news this week surrounds Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section ...

  8. Fischer v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer_v._United_States

    Fischer v. United States, 603 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case about the proper use of the felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, established in the SarbanesOxley Act, against participants in the January 6 United States Capitol attack. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in June of 2024 that the charge only applied ...

  9. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Andersen_LLP_v...

    Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstruction of justice in the fraudulent activities and subsequent collapse of Enron.