enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. A priori and a posteriori - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori

    A priori ('from the earlier') and a posteriori ('from the later') are Latin phrases used in philosophy to distinguish types of knowledge, justification, or argument by their reliance on experience. A priori knowledge is independent from any experience. Examples include mathematics, [i] tautologies and deduction from pure reason.

  3. A posteriori necessity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_posteriori_necessity

    A posteriori necessity existing would make the distinction between a prioricity, analyticity, and necessity harder to discern because they were previously thought to be largely separated from the a posteriori, the synthetic, and the contingent. [3] (a) P is a priori iff P is necessary. (b) P is a posteriori iff P is contingent.

  4. Category:A priori - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:A_priori

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  5. Outline of knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_knowledge

    A priori and a posteriori knowledge – these terms are used with respect to reasoning (epistemology) to distinguish necessary conclusions from first premises.. A priori knowledge or justification – knowledge that is independent of experience, as with mathematics, tautologies ("All bachelors are unmarried"), and deduction from pure reason (e.g., ontological proofs).

  6. Empirical evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

    The proposition "some bachelors are happy", on the other hand, is only knowable a posteriori since it depends on experience of the world as its justifier. [28] Immanuel Kant held that the difference between a posteriori and a priori is tantamount to the distinction between empirical and non-empirical knowledge. [29]

  7. Outline of epistemology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_epistemology

    A priori and a posteriori; Analytic–synthetic distinction; Gettier problem; Justification. Regress argument. Münchhausen trilemma; Theories of justification. Foundationalism – Basic beliefs justify other, non-basic beliefs.

  8. Hume's fork - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume's_fork

    Hume's strong empiricism, as in Hume's fork as well as Hume's problem of induction, was taken as a threat to Newton's theory of motion. Immanuel Kant responded with his Transcendental Idealism in his 1781 Critique of Pure Reason, where Kant attributed to the mind a causal role in sensory experience by the mind's aligning the environmental input by arranging those sense data into the experience ...

  9. A priori and a posterior knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=A_priori_and_a_posterior...

    Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; A priori and a posterior knowledge