Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level.
Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 83.1% 49/59 4 8 0 4 16 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 70% 42/60 7 4 0 8 19 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 70% 42/60 7 3 0 2 12 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 78.3% 47/60 6 10 0 5 21 ...
The U.S. Department of Justice sued Oklahoma on Tuesday seeking to block a law that seeks to impose criminal penalties on those living in the state illegally. The lawsuit in federal court in ...
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States: 11-597: 2012-12-04 Repeated, temporary flooding caused by the government is not automatically exempt from the Takings Clause, so the case was remanded for the lower court to decide if the government has to pay owners for using their land. Kloeckner v. Solis: 11-184: 2012-12-10
Justice Amy Coney Barrett's first opinion shields the EPA from being forced to release draft opinions on new rules. In FOIA and immigration rulings, Supreme Court gives government the benefit of ...
Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 77.6% 45/58 6 4 0 7 17 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 82.8% 48/58 5 6 0 4 15 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 81% 47/58 6 1 0 4 11 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 81% 47/58 7 10 1 3 21 ...
A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said on Tuesday that the ban was still valid even after recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have expanded gun ...
Esteras v. United States: 23-7483: Whether, even though Congress excluded from list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. October 21, 2024 (February 25, 2025) FCC v. Consumers' Research: 24-354