Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Washington Times stated that it "stands as possibly the worst movie ever made". [20] [21] The Spokesman-Review included the film on its list of the worst films of all time, while Paul Newberry of the Associated Press wrote that the film's place on "nearly every list of the worst movies ever made" was "with good reason".
The authors also used egregious examples to represent less reputable film genres, such as blaxploitation films (Trouble Man), Japanese monster movies (Godzilla vs. Hedorah), Spaghetti Westerns (Return of Sabata) and Tarzanesque jungle movies (Daughter of the Jungle) alongside anime (Alakazam the Great), disaster movies (Airport 1975), sexploitation films (Myra Breckinridge), Elvis Presley ...
It was produced by George Weiss who also made the exploitation film Test Tube Babies that same year. [2] The film is a docudrama about cross-dressing and transvestism, and is semi-autobiographical in nature. Wood himself was a cross-dresser, and the film is a plea for tolerance. It was widely considered one of the worst films ever made upon
Year Released: 2000 Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 2 percent Number of Reviews: 60 U.S. Box Office Gross: $5.3 million Critic quote: “The In Crowd isn't a movie, it's Gorgonzola, a crumbly summertime ...
Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Carlyle in "Formula 51." Samuel L. Jackson has probably worn the worst wig in film history. He’s been in, like, a zillion movies, and he’s had some unbelievable ...
Here are the best and worst films of 2024 so far, according to critics. "Will & Harper" left critics laughing and wiping away tears. Will Ferrell and Harper Steele in "Will & Harper."
CNN's Paul Clinton called it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history" and listed the running time as "87 awful minutes." [ 15 ] Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert gave the film a rare zero-star rating and listed it as one of his most hated films of all time, [ 16 ] and described the film thusly ...
Some have called it the worst movie of the early 2000s, while Roger Ebert regarded it as the best film of 2005. But the win's backlash may have also had to do with how voters felt about another ...