Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Donald Trump spared prison or fine as judge sentences him in historic case January 10, 2025 at 9:05 AM US President-elect Donald Trump has been sentenced to "unconditional discharge", meaning he ...
People v. Trump Court New York Supreme Court Full case name The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump Submitted March 30, 2023 Started April 15, 2024 Decided May 30, 2024 Verdict Guilty on all counts Charge First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts) Citation IND-71543-23 Case history Subsequent action Sentence of unconditional discharge Court membership Judge sitting ...
The criminal trial in The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump was held from April 15 to May 30, 2024. Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, was charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal payments made to the pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels as hush money to buy her silence over a sexual encounter between them; with costs ...
Donald Trump is accused of 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, a felony under New York state law. Each count carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.
In February 2024, the New York Daily News carried an opinion piece by Nick Akerman, former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York and assistant special Watergate prosecutor, who commented on the similarities with the Watergate case, and stated that Trump was facing almost certain conviction. [71]
By Jack Queen (Reuters) -Donald Trump, the first former U.S. president to be convicted of a crime, will remain a free man while he awaits sentencing and could avoid a prison term entirely for ...
This is Mr Trump’s second state indictment of the year, the first coming in April when he was arraigned in his native New York City by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, who accused him of ...
Lewis A. Kaplan, a New York federal judge, ruled that legal documents over the sexual assault case that Giuffre filed may be served to Prince Andrew through his Los Angeles-based lawyers. [11] [12] The ruling came after Andrew was accused by Giuffre's lawyers of actively trying to evade service of legal documents. [11]