enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  3. California utility faces billions in claims for fire damage ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-utility-faces...

    By Tom Hals (Reuters) - Victims of the Los Angeles wildfires, likely the costliest in U.S. history, are seizing upon a unique California legal doctrine that allows them to collect from their power ...

  4. Overbilling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overbilling

    Overbilling is a part of many fraud audit infrastructures employed by large companies. [12] Computer programs and software is often used to screen a company's finances to check for overbilling or symptoms of overbilling. [13] Overbilling has been the focus of several infamous scandals, such as the Worldcom scandal [14] and the bankruptcy of W ...

  5. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Retail_Liquor...

    California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v. Brown.

  6. Summers v. Tice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_v._Tice

    Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...

  7. Centene agrees to $215 million settlement with California for ...

    www.aol.com/news/centene-agrees-215-million...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    The Harvard Law Review Association, Labor and Employment Law – Worker Status – California Adopts the ABC Test to Distinguish Between Employees and Independent Contractors – Assemb. B. 5, 2019–2020 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019)(Enacted)(Codified at Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2750.3, 3351 and Cal. Unemp.

  9. Settlement proposed to resolve billing issues by PPL Electric ...

    www.aol.com/settlement-proposed-resolve-billing...

    Nov. 23—WILKES-BARRE — The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) on Wednesday said it will evaluate and consider a joint settlement that addresses widespread consumer billing issues by ...