Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In June 2023, the California State Assembly passed ACA-5 in a unanimous vote, and the following month another unanimous vote took place in the California State Senate, therefore placing the proposal to repeal Proposition 8 on the ballot in 2024. [319] The measure was approved by over 61% of voters.
Repeals 2008 California Proposition 8 and declares in the state constitution that the "right to marry is a fundamental right", effectively allowing same-sex couples to once again marry. [23] 4: Passed Authorizes the issuance of $10 billion in bonds to fund various water infrastructure, energy, and environmental protection projects. [24] 5: Failed
Proposition 71 (2004) Passed: On the use of stem cells in scientific research. Proposition 73 (2005) Defeated: Parental notification before abortion. Proposition 83 (2006) Passed: Various restrictions of civil liberties for paroled sex offenders (Jessica's Law). Proposition 85 (2006) Defeated: Second attempt at Proposition 73. Proposition 8 (2008)
Proposition 4 This bond measure would authorize the state to borrow $10 billion to help fund the response to climate-related disasters such as drought, flooding and extreme heat. It would also ...
The proposition would authorize $10 billion in state debt to spend on environmental and climate projects. Prop. 4 explained: What would California do with a $10B climate cash infusion? Skip to ...
After closely passing, the backlash from those who opposed Proposition 8 was widely covered by news media and was controversial. Anti-Proposition 8 activists looked up supporters in state-government-required donation documentation, then posted their names and personal information, and organized protests at their places of work. [3]
What to know about California's Proposition 4, the proposed $10 billion climate bond that would pay for climate and environmental projects. ... July 8, 2024 at 9:52 AM (Los Angeles Times) The Safe ...
The other proposition received a higher number of votes and so, under the California constitution, it took precedence. [2] Section 28 finally provided that prior felony convictions "shall subsequently be used without limitation for purposes of impeachment or enhancement of sentence in any criminal proceeding".