Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on October 20, 2020. The suit alleges that Google has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 by illegally monopolizing the search engine and search advertising markets, most notably on Android devices, as well as with Apple and mobile carriers.
On January 5, 2024, NetChoice sued the Dave Yost who is the Attorney General of Ohio in the Southern District of Ohio. [1] [2]The same day that NetChoice sued that filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and 4 days later on January 9, 2024, Judge Algenon L. Marbley granted the Temporary Restraining Order and had already scheduled a hearing for a Preliminary Injunction for February 7 ...
Ohio is wrongly seeking to prevent Google from giving preferential treatment to its own products or services in search results.
The Court heard the case on April 22, 2014. [23] Several amici curiae filed briefs. Justice Clarence Thomas, on behalf of a unanimous Supreme Court, reversed the judgement of the two lower courts and remanded the case to the lower courts so that the SBA List could pursue its constitutional rights against the Ohio law. [23]
(The Center Square) – Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a $17 million lawsuit Tuesday against a northern Ohio company that dates back six decades. The lawsuit says the United States Gypsum ...
Controversial Ohio database searches of Joe Wurzelbacher occurred during the last few weeks of the 2008 US Presidential election campaign, when Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) employees, and Ohio officials, became embroiled in a controversy over searches of Joe Wurzelbacher's government records after he came to national attention as "Joe the Plumber."
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation, 280 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2002) withdrawn, re-filed at 336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003), [1] is a U.S. court case between a commercial photographer and a search engine company. During the case, ownership of Arriba Soft changed to Sorceron, the operator of the Internet search engine Ditto.com.