Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291 is a leading English trusts law case, concerning resulting trusts. It demonstrates that the mere intention to not have a resulting trust (for example, to avoid taxes) does not make it so. This case was the first in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell's trusts and his tax ...
Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd (No 2) Court: Court of Appeal: Full case name: White v Vandervell Trustees Ltd (No 2) Decided: 3 July 1974: Citations [1974] EWCA Civ 7, [1974] Ch 269: Case history; Prior action [1973] 3 WLR 744, [1974] 1 All ER 47: Court membership; Judges sitting: Lord Denning MR, Stephenson LJ and Lawton LJ: Keywords; Resulting trusts
Lord Diplock also summarised the facts as follows.. My Lords, between July and October 1967 the executors of the late Mr. Vandervell were served with notices of assessment to surtax for the years 1962-63, 1963-64 and 1964-65 upon dividends which had been paid to the Vandervell Trustees, Ltd. as trustees of a settlement made by Mr. Vandervell in 1949.
Chief fiscal officer Erin Bertain warned the board on Tuesday that the decision to hand count votes could cost the county at least $3 million through the 2024-2025 fiscal year, because the county ...
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners
This week, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors agreed to settle the lawsuit for a payment of $1.5 million, according to Sacramento civil rights attorney Mark Merin, who filed the suit and ...
The California Correctional Institution and Adventist Health did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Read more: San José to pay record settlement of $12 million to man exonerated in ...
When this occurs, the property is held on resulting trust for the settlor, as in Vandervell v IRC. [17] This also occurs where a trust is formed over property which requires formality, but is improperly created (for example, a land transfer that does not adhere to the Law of Property Act 1925). [18]