Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
negation: not propositional logic, Boolean algebra: The statement is true if and only if A is false. A slash placed through another operator is the same as placed in front. The prime symbol is placed after the negated thing, e.g. ′ [2]
Given a formula X, the negation ¬X is a formula. Given two formulas X and Y, and a binary connective b (such as the logical conjunction ∧), the expression (X b Y) is a formula. (Note the parentheses.) Through this construction, all of the formulas of propositional logic can be built up from propositional variables as a basic unit.
The exclusive or is also equivalent to the negation of a logical biconditional, by the rules of material implication (a material conditional is equivalent to the disjunction of the negation of its antecedent and its consequence) and material equivalence. In summary, we have, in mathematical and in engineering notation:
In classical logic, negation is normally identified with the truth function that takes truth to falsity (and vice versa). In intuitionistic logic , according to the Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation , the negation of a proposition P {\displaystyle P} is the proposition whose proofs are the refutations of P {\displaystyle P} .
A well-formed formula is any atomic formula, or any formula that can be built up from atomic formulas by means of operator symbols according to the rules of the grammar. The language L {\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}} , then, is defined either as being identical to its set of well-formed formulas, [ 48 ] or as containing that set (together with ...
In Boolean logic, logical NOR, [1] non-disjunction, or joint denial [1] is a truth-functional operator which produces a result that is the negation of logical or.That is, a sentence of the form (p NOR q) is true precisely when neither p nor q is true—i.e. when both p and q are false.
In propositional logic, the double negation of a statement states that "it is not the case that the statement is not true". In classical logic, every statement is logically equivalent to its double negation, but this is not true in intuitionistic logic; this can be expressed by the formula A ≡ ~(~A) where the sign ≡ expresses logical equivalence and the sign ~ expresses negation.
If our interpretation function makes Φ True, then ¬Φ is made False by the negation connective. Since the disjunct Φ of F is True under that interpretation, F is True. Now the only other possible interpretation of Φ makes it False, and if so, ¬Φ is made True by the negation function.