Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Banach's match problem is a classic problem in probability attributed to Stefan Banach.Feller [1] says that the problem was inspired by a humorous reference to Banach's smoking habit in a speech honouring him by Hugo Steinhaus, but that it was not Banach who set the problem or provided an answer.
Comparing p(n) = probability of a birthday match with q(n) = probability of matching your birthday. In the birthday problem, neither of the two people is chosen in advance. By contrast, the probability q(n) that at least one other person in a room of n other people has the same birthday as a particular person (for example, you) is given by
We assume equal probability that either is a boy or a girl. The three discernible cases are thus: both are girls (GG) – with probability P(GG) = 1 / 4 , both are boys (BB) – with probability of P(BB) = 1 / 4 , and; one of each (G·B) – with probability of P(G·B) = 1 / 2 . These are the prior probabilities.
[50] [13] [49] The conditional probability of winning by switching is 1/3 / 1/3 + 1/6 , which is 2 / 3 . [2] The conditional probability table below shows how 300 cases, in all of which the player initially chooses door 1, would be split up, on average, according to the location of the car and the choice of door to open by the host.
A probability distribution can either be univariate or multivariate. A univariate distribution gives the probabilities of a single random variable ... [11] [12] [13 ...
Graphs of probabilities of getting the best candidate (red circles) from n applications, and k/n (blue crosses) where k is the sample size. The secretary problem demonstrates a scenario involving optimal stopping theory [1] [2] that is studied extensively in the fields of applied probability, statistics, and decision theory.
The problem of points, also called the problem of division of the stakes, is a classical problem in probability theory.One of the famous problems that motivated the beginnings of modern probability theory in the 17th century, it led Blaise Pascal to the first explicit reasoning about what today is known as an expected value.
The Bertrand paradox is a problem within the classical interpretation of probability theory. Joseph Bertrand introduced it in his work Calcul des probabilités (1889) [1] as an example to show that the principle of indifference may not produce definite, well-defined results for probabilities if it is applied uncritically when the domain of possibilities is infinite.