Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia , original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. [ a ] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources .
The definition of original research in the policy is: material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.. This definition is clarified in a footnote: By "exists", the community means that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no ...
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.
Research that analyzes articles, talk pages, or other content on Wikipedia is not typically controversial, since all of Wikipedia is open and freely usable. However, research projects that are disruptive to the community or which negatively affect articles—even temporarily—are not allowed and can result in loss of editing privileges.
Wikipedia:No original research/Wikipedia:Verifiability – Wikipedia is not the place to publish new, original research or find research which has not yet been recognized by credible sources; Wikipedia:Patent nonsense – At any given time, a Wikipedia article may contain nonsense.
Wikipedia:No original research, and a litany of essays such as Wikipedia:The Truth, give us guidance for when we personally disagree with a source based on our own subjective views. But what about when sources disagree on basic facts, and one source is just clearly right, or where a source makes a claim that defies common sense and does not ...
"The main source used to defend a research question. For example, critical essays, documented studies, scholarly or technical journals, or interviews with experts." "Information which has not been interpreted by another person, ie, original articulation of an idea or concept." Definitions of a secondary source:
No original research Typical academic writing requires students to do original research, have a point of view, and argue it. Wikipedia, however, is a tertiary source of information—based on a collection of secondary sources writing about a primary source.