Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In numerical analysis, a quasi-Newton method is an iterative numerical method used either to find zeroes or to find local maxima and minima of functions via an iterative recurrence formula much like the one for Newton's method, except using approximations of the derivatives of the functions in place of exact derivatives.
Fermat's theorem is central to the calculus method of determining maxima and minima: in one dimension, one can find extrema by simply computing the stationary points (by computing the zeros of the derivative), the non-differentiable points, and the boundary points, and then investigating this set to determine the extrema.
The point where the red constraint tangentially touches a blue contour is the maximum of f(x, y) along the constraint, since d 1 > d 2. For the case of only one constraint and only two choice variables (as exemplified in Figure 1), consider the optimization problem, (,) (,) = (Sometimes an additive constant is shown separately rather than being ...
Stated precisely, suppose that f is a real-valued function defined on some open interval containing the point x and suppose further that f is continuous at x.. If there exists a positive number r > 0 such that f is weakly increasing on (x − r, x] and weakly decreasing on [x, x + r), then f has a local maximum at x.
It was first proposed in 1974 by Rastrigin [1] as a 2-dimensional function and has been generalized by Rudolph. [2] The generalized version was popularized by Hoffmeister & Bäck [3] and Mühlenbein et al. [4] Finding the minimum of this function is a fairly difficult problem due to its large search space and its large number of local minima.
Finding the extrema of functionals is similar to finding the maxima and minima of functions. The maxima and minima of a function may be located by finding the points where its derivative vanishes (i.e., is equal to zero). The extrema of functionals may be obtained by finding functions for which the functional derivative is equal to
For very simple problems, say a function of two variables subject to a single equality constraint, it is most practical to apply the method of substitution. [4] The idea is to substitute the constraint into the objective function to create a composite function that incorporates the effect of the constraint.
Although the first derivative (3x 2) is 0 at x = 0, this is an inflection point. (2nd derivative is 0 at that point.) Unique global maximum at x = e. (See figure at right) x −x: Unique global maximum over the positive real numbers at x = 1/e. x 3 /3 − x: First derivative x 2 − 1 and second derivative 2x.