enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct

    Guest authorship (where there is stated authorship in the absence of involvement, also known as gift authorship) and ghost authorship (where the real author is not listed as an author) are commonly regarded as forms of research misconduct. In some cases coauthors of faked research have been accused of inappropriate behavior or research ...

  3. File:Ioannidis (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ioannidis_(2005)_Why...

    attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  4. Academic authorship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_authorship

    Ghost authorship occurs when an individual makes a substantial contribution to the research or the writing of the report, but is not listed as an author. [53] Researchers, statisticians and writers (e.g. medical writers or technical writers ) become ghost authors when they meet authorship criteria but are not named as an author.

  5. Plagiarism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

    Plagiarism, in contrast, is concerned with the unearned increment to the plagiarizing author's reputation, or the obtaining of academic credit, that is achieved through false claims of authorship. Thus, plagiarism is considered a moral offense against the plagiarist's audience (for example, a reader, listener, or teacher).

  6. False attribution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_attribution

    False attribution may refer to: Misattribution in general, when a quotation or work is accidentally, traditionally, or based on bad information attributed to the wrong person or group A specific fallacy where an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased, or fabricated source in support of an argument.

  7. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review. Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly ...

  8. Dr. Mehmet Oz had up to $33 million in companies doing ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/dr-mehmet-oz-had-33-100758042.html

    President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be the top health insurance regulator in the country, Dr. Mehmet Oz, has invested in companies that do business with the agency he would run.. Oz, Trump ...

  9. Cherry picking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

    Cherry picking in debates is a large problem as the facts themselves are true but need to be put in context. Because research cannot be done live and is often untimely, cherry-picked facts or quotes usually stick in the public mainstream and, even when corrected, lead to widespread misrepresentation of groups targeted.