Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
Tan Nguyen's $50,000 was confiscated by police during a traffic stop, and the county agreed to return the funds after a legal challenge. [36] In May 2010 a couple was driving from New York to Florida and they were stopped by police because of a cracked windshield. [35]
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz , 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints . The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure."
Keego Harbor Police Chief John Fitzgerald says officers can lie when “not under oath” DETROIT (AP) — A Black man […] The post Michigan case offers an example of how public trust suffers ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Asset forfeiture or asset seizure is a form of confiscation of assets by the authorities.In the United States, it is a type of criminal-justice financial obligation.It typically applies to the alleged proceeds or instruments of crime.
Detroit police are continuing to crack down on illegal block parties across the city, an initiative announced in the aftermath of a mass block party shooting July 7, police department officials ...
Ray Will sued the Michigan State Police Department and the Director of the State Police in the Michigan Court of Claims alleging various violations of the Constitutions of the United States and Michigan as a claim under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which had been codified into the United States Code at 42 U.S.C. § 1983.