Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...
This page was last edited on 23 November 2009, at 17:41 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
early case on standard of review for regulations: Fox Film Corp. v. Muller: 296 U.S. 207 (1935) contract dispute, "adequate and independent state ground" United States v. Constantine: 296 U.S. 287 (1935) taxation of liquor: United States v. Butler: 297 U.S. 1 (1936) Taxation power, Tenth Amendment: Grosjean v. American Press Co. 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
A California law barring employers from requiring their employees to resolve workplace complaints in private runs afoul of federal law, a federal court ruled.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday withdrew a $54 million contract with Walgreens after the pharmacy giant indicated it would not sell an abortion pill by mail in some conservative-led states.
Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned whether the "section one exemption" of the Federal Arbitration Act applied to an employment contract of an employee at Circuit City Stores. The Court held that the exemption was limited to the specific listing of professions contained ...
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning arbitration of antitrust claims. The Court heard the case on appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which had ruled that the arbitration clause in a Puerto Rican car dealer's franchise agreement was broad enough to reach its ...
In 2019, Lynn Thompson sued Tesla for terminating his security contract after he reported the theft of US$37 million worth of copper and other raw materials to local authorities. [142] [143] In 2020, the case was stayed pending arbitration. [144] In February 2024, the case was dismissed with prejudice. [145]