enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: trade secret misappropriation claims act

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Defend Trade Secrets Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defend_Trade_Secrets_Act

    The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) (Pub. L. 114–153 (text), 130 Stat. 376, enacted May 11, 2016, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1836, et seq.) is a United States federal law that allows an owner of a trade secret to sue in federal court when its trade secrets have been misappropriated. [1]

  3. Uniform Trade Secrets Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Trade_Secrets_Act

    The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), published by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) in 1979 and amended in 1985, is a model law designed for adoption by U.S. states. [1] It was developed to resolve inconsistencies in the treatment of trade secrets across different states.

  4. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Associates...

    CA's second argument for the appeal concerned trade secret misappropriation. The district court determined that the allegation of misappropriation was based on Altai's use of the infringing material, therefore the copyright infringement claim preempted the misappropriation claim according to 17 U.S.C. § 301. [5]

  5. Paypal v. Google: a tawdry tale of trade secret misappropriation

    www.aol.com/news/2011-05-28-paypal-v-google-a...

    Google and its poached Paypal employees got sued for trade secret misappropriation yesterday, but we didn't know the dirty details until now. A peek at PayPal's complaint reveals there's a bit ...

  6. Trade secret - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_secret

    The UTSA influenced the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) of 2016, which created a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, allowing plaintiffs to file cases directly in federal courts if "the trade secret is related to a product or service used in ... interstate or foreign commerce." [23]

  7. Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajaxo_Inc._v._E*Trade...

    Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp., 187 Cal.App.4th 1295 (2010), is the second appeal on a dispute dated back to 1999. [1] During the original 2000 case, defendant E*Trade, an online financial services company, was found liable for maliciously and willfully misappropriating trade secrets pertaining to wireless stock trading technology acquired from the plaintiff, Ajaxo.

  8. List of United States state trade secret laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Nebraska's Trade Secrets Act defines a trade secret as information, including, but not limited to, a drawing, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, code, or process that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being known to, and not being ascertainable by proper means by, other ...

  9. PhoneDog v. Kravitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhoneDog_v._Kravitz

    PhoneDog claimed that Kravitz's Twitter account, particularly the password to the account, was a trade secret, and that his continued use of the account to connect followers to a PhoneDog competitor was misappropriation. The claim for misappropriation of trade secrets is governed by the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA).

  1. Ad

    related to: trade secret misappropriation claims act