enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Sworn declaration - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sworn_declaration

   A sworn declaration used in place of an affidavit must be specifically authorized by statute. The federal courts and a few states have general statutes allowing a sworn declaration in any matter where an affidavit can be used. [2] [3] In other cases, sworn statements are allowed for some purposes, but not others. [4]

3. Affidavit - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affidavit

   An affidavit is typically defined as a written declaration or statement that is sworn or affirmed before a person who has authority to administer an oath. There is no general defined form for an affidavit, although for some proceedings an affidavit must satisfy legal or statutory requirements in order to be considered. [1] An affidavit may include,

4. Statutory declaration - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_declaration

   Australian law defines a statutory declaration as a written statement declared to be true in the presence of an authorised witness. The Statutory Declarations Act 1959 governs the use of statutory declarations in matters involving the law of the Australian Commonwealth, Australian Capital Territory, and other territories but not including the Northern Territory.

5. Jurat (clause) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurat_(clause)

   In English and American law, a jurat is that part of an affidavit which contains the names of the parties swearing the affidavit, the actual statement that an oath or affirmation has been made, the person before whom it was sworn, the date, place and other necessary particulars. The jurat is usually located on the bottom of a document.

6. Lawyer releases sworn statement backing Mexico Beach ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/lifestyle/lawyer-releases-sworn...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

7. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

   the witness is subject to cross-examination about the prior statement. [4] There is no requirement that the prior consistent statement have been made under oath at a prior trial or hearing. A form of prior consistent statement excepted from this rule is that of prior identification by the witness of another person in a lineup. [citation needed]