enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of gender equality lawsuits - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gender_equality...

    Indian status retained or lost by Indian women marrying non-Indian men: Supreme Court of Canada: 1973 Chen-Oster v. Goldman Sachs & Co. certified class of over 2,000 female associates and vice-presidents challenging systemic discrimination in pay, promotions, and performance reviews: United States District Court for the Southern District of New ...

  3. Non-fatal offences against the person in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-fatal_offences_against...

    Thus forms (1) and (3) differ from section 20 offences mainly in that there is a specific intention to cause serious harm rather than some harm, and they are therefore the more serious charges. On an indictment under section 18, the jury is open to convict under section 20 or section 47 if properly directed. [40]

  4. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor...

    The Supreme Court agreed in January 2020 to hear the cases, consolidating both the Little Sisters and government petition. [11] Congressmember Debbie Lesko showing her support for the Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter in 2020. Oral arguments were heard on May 6, 2020, part of the set of cases heard via teleconference due to the COVID-19 ...

  5. June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_Medical_Services,_LLC...

    June Medical Services had been considered a potentially important case on abortion rights in the United States, as it was the first abortion-related case to be heard by both Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, two justices that are considered conservative, giving the Court a conservative majority, and potentially threatening the Roe v.

  6. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  7. THE END - HuffPost

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2007-09-10-EOA...

    All of us—Republicans, Democrats, Independents, American citizens—have little time to repeal the laws and roll back the forces that can bring about the end of the American system we have inher-ited from the Founders—a system that has protected our freedom for over 200 years. — 3 — Ten Steps EOA2 Final Pages 7/27/07 12:05 PM Page 3

  8. Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) in the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_legal...

    Section 4 provided for retention of American citizenship by formerly alien women who had acquired citizenship by marriage to an American after the termination of their marriages. Women residing in the US would retain their American citizenship automatically if they did not explicitly renounce; women residing abroad would have the option to ...

  9. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.