Ad
related to: administrative law cases canada- Literature & Fiction
Hand-picked reads from the Amazon
Books Editors
- Textbooks
Save money by buying or renting
the textbooks that you need.
- Books in French
Shop best sellers, new releases and
deals on French books
- Audible
Start your free 30-day trial.
Listen anywhere.
- Literature & Fiction
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817 is a leading Canadian administrative law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court provided guidance on the standard of judicial review of administrative decisions. The issue was what standard of procedural fairness should be applied when considering the ...
Pushpanathan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the standard of review in Canadian administrative law. The Court held that a decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board should be reviewed on the standard of "correctness."
The court held that is the case when constitutional questions are at issue, when the administrative decision involves a "general question of law of central importance to the legal system as a whole," or when the decision under review pertains to the jurisdiction of two or more tribunals. [10]
Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law.The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds.
In Canadian administrative law, judicial review is for courts to ensure "administrative decision-makers" stay within the boundaries of the law. [1] It is meant to ensure that powers granted to government actors, administrative agencies, boards and tribunals are exercised consistently with the rule of law. Judicial review is intended as a last ...
In addition to the parties (Doré, the Barreau du Québec, the Tribunal des professions, and the Attorney General of Quebec), the Court heard from the following intervenors: the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and the Young Bar Association of Montreal.
Canadian patent law: Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2009 SCC 12 March 6, 2009 Standard of review in administrative law BMP Global Distribution Inc v Bank of Nova Scotia [2009] 1 S.C.R. 504, 2009 SCC 15 April 2, 2009 Restitution and tracing: R v Patrick [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579 , 2009 SCC 17 April 9, 2009
Canadian administrative law is the body of law "that applies to all administrative decisions, whether issued by front-line officials, ministers, economic regulatory agencies, or administrative tribunals, with interpretations of law and exercises of discretion subject to the same . . . rules."
Ad
related to: administrative law cases canada