Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The FEC, however, held that showing Celsius 41.11 and advertisements for it would violate the Federal Election Campaign Act, because Citizens United was not a bona fide commercial film maker. [ 8 ] In the wake of these decisions, Citizens United sought to establish itself as a bona fide commercial filmmaker before the 2008 elections, producing ...
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 558 of the United States ... Citizens United v. FEC: 558 U.S. 310: 2009: ... additional terms ...
The Supreme Court in a landmark 2010 ruling in a case called Citizens United v. FEC invalidated longstanding campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups such as ...
The amendment was proposed in response to the implications presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), a U.S. constitutional law case concerning the regulation of independent political expenditures by corporations, which the nonprofit organization Citizens United challenged on the ...
One was curtailing the impact of the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed corporations and outside groups to spend unlimited money on elections.
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission transformed US elections, opening the floodgates to groups like FF PAC, which were allowed to accept ...
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us