enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: california summary judgment no reply period due

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vergara v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergara_v._California

    Surveying tenure periods in other U.S. states, the court found that as of the trial (January 27 to March 27, 2014) [22] 4 states had no tenure system at all, 9 states had tenure periods of four to five years, 32 had a three-year period, and 5 (including California) had a period of two years or less. [23]

  3. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    The California view is that the latter term is an oxymoron since a judgment is defined by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 577 as the "final determination of the rights of the parties" [17] and a "partial summary judgment" is not actually final since it necessarily leaves some issues to be decided at trial. There is currently a ...

  4. Jacobsen v. Katzer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobsen_v._Katzer

    On March 8, 2005, Katzer sent patent infringement letters and bills to Jacobsen, claiming that the code in the JMRI project infringed his patent, [53] and that more than $200,000 was due for licensing fees of previously distributed versions of the project. [54] [55] Jacobsen filed for a declaratory judgment against Katzer. [56]

  5. Burnham v. Superior Court of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnham_v._Superior_Court...

    Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine ...

  6. Douglas v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_v._California

    The Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment of the California District Court of Appeal. In an opinion by Justice Douglas, expressing the view of six members of the Court, it was held that the denial of counsel under the California rule of procedure stated above violated the Fourteenth Amendment.

  7. Oyama v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyama_v._California

    Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948) was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that specific provisions of the 1913 and 1920 California Alien Land Laws abridged the rights and privileges guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to Fred Oyama, a U.S. citizen in whose name his father, a Japanese citizen, had purchased land.

  8. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  9. Peruta v. San Diego County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

    Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a ...

  1. Ad

    related to: california summary judgment no reply period due